Twining's Appeal

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the rules governing pleading in a workmen’s compensation case do not mirror the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure, and that pleadings in compensation cases should be liberally construed
• holding that the rules governing pleading in a workmen's compensation case do not mirror the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure, and that pleadings in compensation cases should be liberally construed
• “This Court has consistently maintained that the rules governing pleadings in Workmen’s Compensation cases do not mirror the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure, and that the pleadings in compensation cases should be liberally construed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).