Twin Laboratories, Inc. v. Weider Health & Fitness, a Corporation, I, Brute Enterprises, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an essential facility claim must allege “more than inconvenience, or even some economic loss”
• noting that although market share is the “primary indicator” of a dangerous probability of success, it is “not the sole one”
• noting that plaintiff must allege absence of feasible alternative to sustain hypothetical essential facility claim
• noting that a monopoly leveraging claim requires \tangible harm to competition\
• noting that a plaintiff’s allegations must be “done with the sole intent to harm”
• assuming for purposes of essential facilities discussion that defendant possessed monopoly power in relevant market

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).