Skip to main content
· 7/17/2014

Twin City Pipe Trades Service Ass'n v. Frank O'Laughlin Plumbing & Heating Co.

Citations

  • 759 F.3d 881
  • 58 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2583
  • 2014 WL 3511784
  • 200 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3073
  • 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 13634

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining similar facts did terminate the CBA but holding the employer did not terminate the CBA based on “inconsistent conduct” post-termination
  • “a collective bargaining agreement is not dependent on the reduction to writing of the parties’ intention to be bound” (citation and quotations omitted)
  • “We decline to formally recognize a termination defense in this case . . . because the circumstances involved here would not support such a defense in any event.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wollman, Bye, Benton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.