Twin City Fire Insurance v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “if [insured] desired broader coverage with less exclusion as to asbestos claims, and if [insurer] had been willing to provide such expanded coverage, an increase in premium would have been the factor that would best evidence such an intent”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).