TWIN CITY FIRE INS. COMPANY v. Alfa Mut. Ins. Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \[The insurer] has the burden of proof in asserting that a claim is excluded under its policy of insurance.\
• \[The insurer] has the burden of proof in asserting that a claim is excluded under its policy of insurance.\
• \[The insurer] has the burden of proof in asserting that a claim is excluded under its policy of insurance.\
• declaratory judgment action by insurer: “Twin City [the insurer] has the burden of proof in asserting that a claim is excluded under its policy of insurance”
• “If an insurance policy is clear and unambiguous in its terms, then there is no question of interpretation or construction.”
• “The fact that the parties interpret the insurance policy differently does not make the insurance policy ambiguous.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).