Skip to main content
· 9/25/1992

Twenty First Century Corp. v. LaBianca

Citations

  • 801 F. Supp. 1007
  • 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14904
  • 1992 WL 246570

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that a stay in a civil action “may streamline later civil discovery since transcripts from the criminal case will be available to the civil parties”
  • “Allowing civil discovery to proceed ... may afford defendants an opportunity to gain evidence to which they are not entitled under the governing criminal discovery rules.”
  • “Allowing civil discovery to proceed… may afford defendants an opportunity to which they are not entitled under the governing criminal discovery rules.”
  • recognizing judicial economy as a factor to be considered
  • recognizing judicial economy as a factor to be considered
  • “Allowing civil discovery to proceed . . . may afford defendants an opportunity to gain evidence to which they are not entitled under the governing criminal discovery rules.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Glasser

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.