· 6/4/1985
Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp. v. Department of Revenue
Citations
- 700 P.2d 1035
- 299 Or. 220
- 1985 Ore. LEXIS 1288
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that relief under this section of UDITPA is only available in two situations: (1) to remedy unconstitutional results, or (2
- stating that relief under this section of UDITPA is only available in two situations: (1) to remedy unconstitutional results, or (2
- stating that relief under this section of UDITPA is only available in two situations: (1) to remedy unconstitutional results, or (2) to provide an alternative means of apportionment where three factor formula does not fairly represent the business activity of taxpayer
- stating that relief under this section of UDITPA is only available in two situations: (1) to remedy unconstitutional results, or (2) to provide an alternative means of apportionment where three factor formula does not fairly represent the business activity of taxpayer
- construing ORS 314.670 , which contains language nearly identical to that found in Revised M, to so require
- statute applies “in unusual cases” where UDITPA formula does not fairly represent taxpayer’s business activity
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Roberts, Linde
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.