Skip to main content
· 6/4/1985

Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp. v. Department of Revenue

Citations

  • 700 P.2d 1035
  • 299 Or. 220
  • 1985 Ore. LEXIS 1288

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that relief under this section of UDITPA is only available in two situations: (1) to remedy unconstitutional results, or (2
  • stating that relief under this section of UDITPA is only available in two situations: (1) to remedy unconstitutional results, or (2
  • stating that relief under this section of UDITPA is only available in two situations: (1) to remedy unconstitutional results, or (2) to provide an alternative means of apportionment where three factor formula does not fairly represent the business activity of taxpayer
  • stating that relief under this section of UDITPA is only available in two situations: (1) to remedy unconstitutional results, or (2) to provide an alternative means of apportionment where three factor formula does not fairly represent the business activity of taxpayer
  • construing ORS 314.670 , which contains language nearly identical to that found in Revised M, to so require
  • statute applies “in unusual cases” where UDITPA formula does not fairly represent taxpayer’s business activity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Roberts, Linde

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.