Skip to main content
· 11/4/1909

Tweedie Trading Co. v. Thomsen & Co.

Citations

  • 173 F. 710
  • 1909 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 154

Syllabus

<p>Shipping (§§ 175, 184*) — Dejiubbage—Laches—Evidence.</p> <p>Demurrage and expenses at Savannah, Georgia. Claim for the recovery of a fine' paid to the Brazilian government. Held that the libellant was entitled to recover for two da5’s’ demurrage and the expenses of moving the steamer Hathor across the river, for a violation of a bill of lading contract; also held that the testimony was too unsatisfactory to establish a claim for the recovery of the fine paid by a vessel to the Brazilian government.</p> <p>[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Shipping, Cent. Dig. §§ 572-574; Dec. Dig. §§ 175, 184.*</p> <p>Demurrage, see notes to Harrison v. Smith, 14 C. C. A. 657; Randall v. Sprague, 21 C. C. A. 337; Hagerman v. Norton, 46 C. C. A. 4.]</p> <p>(Syllabus by the Judge.)</p>

Judges: Adams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.