Skip to main content
· 1/13/1909

Tweedie Trading Co. v. New York Cent. & H. R. R.

Citations

  • 166 F. 993
  • 1909 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 431

Syllabus

<p>Shipping (|§ 176, 184*) — Demuehage—Evidence,</p> <p>Upon a contract for tlie transportation of bricks by the respondent from New York to Colon, it appeared that there was some detention of two steamers at New York and three at Colon for which the libellant was entitled to recover. A counterclaim on the part of tlie respondent for damages arising from failure to receive the bricks at New York, promptly upon reaching there, dismissed, because the respondent failed to show any agreement to receive except when formal declarations were made upon which proper action was taken.</p> <p>[Ed. Note. — For other eases, see Shipping. Dec. Dig. 45 176. 184.*</p> <p>Demurrage, see notes to Harrison v. Smith, 14 C. C. A. 657; Randall v. Sprague, 21 C. O. A. 337: II a german v. Norton, 46 C. O. A. -JL.J</p> <p>(Syllabus by the Judge.)</p>

Judges: Adtms

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.