TW Telecom Holdings Inc. v. Carolina Internet Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that section 362 “stay[s] all appeals in proceedings that were originally brought against the debtor”
• holding that the automatic stay applies to appeals in proceedings originally filed against the debtor, “regardless of whether the debtor is the appellant or the appellee”
• holding that the tolling provision in 11 U.S.C. § 108 (b), which is similar to the tolling provision of § 108(c), operated to render timely a notice of appeal filed after the lifting of the bankruptcy stay
• reversing prior holding that automatic stay does not prevent debtor from pursuing an appeal, even if appeal is from a creditor's judgment against debtor
• staying the debtor’s appeal because the debtor was the defendant in the underlying proceeding
• stating that this factor “can be dispositive”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).