T.W. And M.W., Minors, by Their Next Friend, Scott Enk v. Thomas Brophy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that without restricting the right to sue to persons with \concrete stakes\ in the litigation, \the federal courts [would] be flooded by `cause' suits ( really flooded)\
• explaining that dispute over Wisconsin court’s custody decree could be refiled in Wisconsin state court
• explaining that dispute over Wisconsin court’s custody decree could be refiled in Wisconsin state court
• noting that without restricting the right to sue to persons with “concrete stakes” in the litigation, “the federal courts [would] be flooded by ‘cause’ suits (really flooded)”
• applying Rooker-Feldiman to Wisconsin child-custody decision
• applying Rooker-Feldiman to Wisconsin child-custody decision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).