Tuttle v. Mickow Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that warrantless arrest of a minor for possession of alcohol was unlawful, because possession of alcohol by a minor is a civil offense and “the officer could do nothing more than issue a citation”
• stating that “it is not sufficient [for malicious destruction of property] that the defendant merely intended to do the act which led to the damage; it is necessary that the defendant actually intended to damage the property in question.”
• finding the evidence failed to establish the defendant intended to maliciously damage the arresting officer’s microphone where the evidence also supported an inference that the defendant was merely attempting to escape from an unlawful arrest when he damaged the equipment
• defendant had standing to challenge a search incident to an unlawful seizure of his person
• “made a ‘fake motion’ as if he was going to hit the officer,” “pushed up against the officer,” “attempted to kick the officers”
• “made a ‘fake motion’ as if he was going to hit the officer,” “pushed up against the officer,” “attempted to kick the officers”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).