Tuttle v. Fruehauf Division of Fruehauf Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining there is not some magic in labeling inconsistent pleadings “alternative” or “hypothetical” which invokes the principle underlying the alternative pleading rule
• court did not abuse its discretion in not giving jury a specific instruction allowing jury to draw adverse inference from a party’s failure to produce evidence solely within that party’s control
• court did not abuse its discretion in not giving jury a specific instruction allowing jury to draw adverse inference from a party's failure to produce evidence solely within that party's control

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).