Tuthill v. Emerson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding factor favored default judgment because “EFF seeks no money, and asks this 10 Court only to declare its constitutional rights”
• “The Australian injunction is a qualifying order 10 under the SPEECH Act because it is a final judgment on a defamation claim”
• statement that plaintiff “seems to be a classic patent troll” could not give rise to defamation liability because the statement was “an expression of opinion”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).