Court of Chancery of Delaware· 12/15/1959
Tusso v. Smith
Citations
- 156 A.2d 783
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- defining “a special law as: ‘[o]ne relating to particular persons or things; one made for individual cases or for particular places or districts’” (quoting Black’s Law Dictionary) (emphasis added)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Application of Oklahoma Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma· 1950-07-21· cited 86×
- State v. EmersonSuperior Court of Delaware· 1939-12-29· cited 23×
- Piekarski v. SmithSupreme Court of Delaware· 1959-07-28· cited 16×
- Wright v. HusbandsSupreme Court of Delaware· 1957-04-25· cited 12×
- Chew v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1917-04-30· cited 12×
- Bittner v. West Virginia-Pittsburgh Coal Co.Fourth Circuit· 1926-10-29· cited 10×
- Condron v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1911-10-09· cited 9×
- State Highway Commissioner v. Chambersburg & Bedford Turnpike Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1913-06-27· cited 9×
- Smith v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSuperior Court of Delaware· 1951-11-29· cited 6×
- Tusso v. SmithCourt of Chancery of Delaware· 1959-12-15· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.