Skip to main content
· 4/11/2002

Tuscano v. Osterberg

Citations

  • 82 S.W.3d 457
  • 2002 Tex. App. LEXIS 2598
  • 2002 WL 535447

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the Texas court could not exercise personal jurisdiction over the plaintiffs conversion claim because the plaintiff provided no proof that the defendants converted any property or materials in Texas
  • defendant’s statement to plaintiff in single telephone call initiated by plaintiff insufficient to establish minimum contacts

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Larsen, McClure, Chew

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.