Turpin v. Burgess
Citations
- 117 U.S. 504
- 6 S. Ct. 835
- 29 L. Ed. 988
- 1886 U.S. LEXIS 1866
Syllabus
<p>The exportation stamp required to be affixed to every package of tobacco intended for exportation, before its removal from the factory, again declared constitutional, and the decision in Pace v. Bwrgess, 92 U. S. 372, reaffirmed. ,</p> <p>An excise laid on tobacco, before its removal from the factory, is not a duty 'on “exports,” or “on articles exported,” within the prohibition of the Constitution, even though' the tobacco be intended for exportation. The case of Goe v. Errol, 116 U. S. 517, cited and applied.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- sustaining, on similar grounds, constitutionality of charge imposed to identify tobacco packages intended for export
- sustaining, on similar grounds, constitutionality of charge imposed to identify tobacco packages intended for export
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bradley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.