Skip to main content
· 2/16/2000

Turpen v. Eide (In Re Turpen)

Citations

  • 244 B.R. 431
  • 2000 Bankr. LEXIS 96
  • 85 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1002
  • 35 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 185
  • 2000 WL 175153

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Even if the debtor can show cause, the court should deny the motion if there is any showing of prejudice to creditors.”
  • “Even if the debtor can show cause, the court should deny the motion if there is any showing of prejudice to creditors.”
  • “Unlike under Chapter 13, the debtor has no absolute right to dismissal of a Chapter 7 case.”
  • “Even if the debtor can show cause, the court should deny the motion if there is any showing of prejudice to creditors.”
  • “creditors can incur prejudice if the motion to dismiss is brought after the passage of a considerable amount of time and they have been forestalled from collecting the amounts owed to them”
  • “[T]he debtor has no absolute right to dismissal of a Chapter 7 case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Koger, Dreher, Kishel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.