Skip to main content
· 9/23/1865

Turners v. Howard

Citations

  • 63 Ky. 112
  • 2 Duv. 112
  • 1865 Ky. LEXIS 23

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming summary judgment in favor of defendants because, inter alia, Mr. Williams “failed to identify admissible evidence in the record demonstrating the existence of genuine issue of material fact in dispute”
  • “Furthermore, only admissible evidence may be considered in a ruling on a motion for summary judgment.” (citing Sarno v. Douglas Elliman-Gibbons & Ives, 183 F.3d 155, 160 (2d Cir. 1999)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.