· 6/3/1925
Turner v. Spinner
Citations
- 6 F.2d 172
- 1925 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1104
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that district court did not err by not excusing for cause where the prospective juror said that she “believed” she could be impartial
- upholding a district court's admission of evidence on a ground “different from the reason given by the district court”
- upholding a district court's admission of evidence on a ground “different from the reason given by the district court”
- denying actual bias claim where a juror affirmatively stated that she could remain impartial, despite the fact that her statements were somewhat equivocal
- two witnesses testified “regarding their contacts with” the defendant and “neither suggested that [he] was not that same man”
- “If a statute is not arbitrary, but implements a rational means of achieving a legitimate governmental end, it satisfies due process.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Campbell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.