Skip to main content
· 6/20/1950

Turner v. Smith

Citations

  • 313 Ky. 635
  • 232 S.W.2d 1006
  • 1950 Ky. LEXIS 917

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • for a means-plus-function claim, “[t]he transition ‘comprising’ creates a presumption that the recited elements are only a part of the device, that the claim does not exclude additional, unrecited elements”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cammack, Whittle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.