Turner v. Schroeder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• characterizing reactions of plaintiff's peers to conduct directed at plaintiff as \significant to the mandated objective analysis\ of whether conduct was sufficiently severe to be actionable under Title IX
• finding no evidence that the “individual defendants embarked on any obstructive scheme, or that the allegedly differential treatment ... was either intentional or lacked a rational basis.”
• no deliberate indifference where the University, through the actions of its officials, acted expeditiously and reasonably in response to plaintiffs allegations
• personal involvement of individual defendants is required to make a successful claim under respondeat superior
• “We think it clear that a professor employed at a state university is a state actor.”
• “In addition, a school district must know of the harassment. Constructive knowledge is not enough; only actual knowledge is a predicate to liability.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).