Skip to main content
· 4/28/2009

Turner v. Public Service Co. of Colorado

Citations

  • 563 F.3d 1136
  • 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 8970
  • 92 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 43,560
  • 106 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 113
  • 2009 WL 1132126

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that, to avoid summary judgment, a plaintiff \must proffer facts such that a reasonable jury could find in her favor\
  • stating that, to avoid summary judg-' ment, a plaintiff “must proffer facts such that a reasonable jury could find in her favor”
  • holding that non-contextual statistics of gender disparities in the workplace do not raise a genuine issue of material fact that such a condition is the result of gender discrimination, or that such gender discrimination was responsible for the alleged employment action
  • finding that poor performance in a job interview as compared to other candidates is a legitimate non-dis- criminatory reason for refusing to hire a candidate
  • finding that “there is no evidence that Turner was ‘actually, rather than merely theoretically’ prejudiced by their loss.”
  • noting that focus of discrimination claim is on the particular decision-maker and evidence of general bias must be tied to decision-maker at issue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hartz, Seymour, Tymkovich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.