Turner v. Nama

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that if the plaintiff should have discovered the fraudulent concealment through due diligence and a reasonable time remains within the limitations period, the fraudulent concealment exception cannot be invoked
• holding that five months between the point at which the plaintiff “discovered or reasonably should have discovered the alleged concealment of her [medical malpractice] cause of action” and the expiration of the statute of limitations was sufficient
• Cunningham doctrine applies to “the aggregate injury caused by the compounding effects of an ongoing course of continuous negligent medical treatment for a specific condition”
• Cunningham doctrine -14- No. 08-2311 applies to “the aggregate injury caused by the compounding effects of an ongoing course of continuous negligent medical treatment for a specific condition”
• health care provider who receives unfavorable test results is obligated to inform patient of results
• fraudulent concealment exception did not apply where plaintiff should have discovered the alleged concealment through ordinary diligence eight months before the repose period elapsed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).