Skip to main content
· 6/11/1997

Turner v. Kerin & Associates

Citations

  • 938 P.2d 1368
  • 283 Mont. 117
  • 54 State Rptr. 522
  • 1997 Mont. LEXIS 110

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • engineering firm liable to any party who holds or succeeds to a security interest in the property serviced by the firm (quoting Prosser's rule)
  • engineering firm liable to any party who holds or succeeds to a security interest in the property serviced by the firm (quoting Prosser’s rule)
  • engineering firm liable to any party who holds or succeeds to a security interest in the property serviced by the firm
  • engineering firm liable to any party who holds or succeeds to a security interest in the property serviced by the firm
  • engineering firm liable to any party who holds or succeeds to a security interest in the property serviced by the firm
  • reversing lower court’s dismissal of mortgagor’s claim that water pipe installed by contractor faded to comply with required standards and thus “impaired” mortgagor’s security interest in real property

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Leaphart, Turnage, Hunt, Nelson, Regnier, Gray, Trieweiler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.