Skip to main content
· 2/29/2012

Turner v. Department of Education

Citations

  • 855 F. Supp. 2d 1155
  • 2012 WL 668829
  • 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26104

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • declining to grant a motion to dismiss because “the Court is not aware of case law that would preclude consideration of [the assignor’s] direct prior course of dealing with [the defendant]”
  • recognizing continuity of care as legitimate procompetitive justification
  • “[T]he existence of a business justification is not properly determined on a motion to dismiss.”
  • “[T]o defeat a tortious interference claim on a motion to dismiss, the privilege or other justification must be one of well-documented and unquestioned authority . . . .” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kay

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.