· 2/29/2012
Turner v. Department of Education
Citations
- 855 F. Supp. 2d 1155
- 2012 WL 668829
- 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26104
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- declining to grant a motion to dismiss because “the Court is not aware of case law that would preclude consideration of [the assignor’s] direct prior course of dealing with [the defendant]”
- recognizing continuity of care as legitimate procompetitive justification
- “[T]he existence of a business justification is not properly determined on a motion to dismiss.”
- “[T]o defeat a tortious interference claim on a motion to dismiss, the privilege or other justification must be one of well-documented and unquestioned authority . . . .” (citation omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kay
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.