Skip to main content
· 3/7/1972

Turner v. County of Del Norte

Citations

  • 24 Cal. App. 3d 311
  • 101 Cal. Rptr. 93
  • 1972 Cal. App. LEXIS 1138

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that owners “may use their lands in a number of ways which may be of economic benefit to them”
  • noting that owners “may use their lands in a number of ways which may be of economic benefit to them”
  • noting evidence “of a frequency of flooding which would almost certainly eventually destroy any permanent residences built on this land,” thus establishing that the zoning ordinance at issue imposed “no restrictions more stringent than the existing danger demands”
  • noting evidence “of a frequency of flooding which would almost certainly eventually destroy any permanent residences built on this land,” thus establishing that the zoning ordinance at issue imposed “no restrictions more stringent than the existing danger demands”
  • a person who purchases land with knowledge of zoning restrictions is not usually qualified to receive an area variance which relieves him of such restrictions
  • upheld limit on use under flood plain ordinance to recreation and agriculture

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brown (h.C.)

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.