Skip to main content

Turner v. Commonwealth

Citations

  • 809 S.E.2d 679
  • 295 Va. 104

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that, when interpreting a statute, we “presume that, in choosing the words of the statute, ‘the General Assembly acted with full knowledge of the law in the area in which it dealt’” (quoting Philip Morris v. The Chesapeake Bay Found., 273 Va. 564, 576 (2007))
  • strict construction of penal statutes is limited to resolving reasonable ambiguities
  • strict construction of penal statutes is limited to resolving reasonable ambiguities
  • strict construction of penal statutes is limited to resolving reasonable ambiguities

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: ELIZABETH McCLANAHAN

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.