Turner v. City of Tacoma

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• describing parties’ competing supplemental instructions as “slanted” and stating “[t]hat we may have used certain language in an opinion does not mean that it can be properly incorporated into a jury instruction”
• imposing liability upon a municipality for failure to abate a public nuisance
• describing parties' competing supplemental instructions as \slanted\ and stating \[t]hat we may have used certain language in an opinion does not mean that it can be properly incorporated into a jury instruction\
• summary judgment for defendant reversed where plaintiff collided with fire escape extending into her pathway on city sidewalk
• summary judgment for defendant reversed where plaintiff collided with fire escape extending into her pathway on city sidewalk
• summary judgment for defendant reversed where plaintiff collided with fire escape extending into her pathway on city sidewalk, because fire escape was illegal and thus per se negligent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).