Turner v. Aldor Co. of Nashville, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• considering whether a plaintiff met the “relation back” requirements of Rule 15.03 to allow him to add a party in his second complaint who was not named in the first
• “[Plaintiff] offered no other proof that [New Defendant] knew of these claims by other means. Thus, the only conclusion to be drawn is that [New Defendant] did not have timely notice of [Plaintiff’s] negligence and strict liability claims.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).