· 7/10/1981
Turner v. Aldens, Inc.
Citations
- 433 A.2d 439
- 179 N.J. Super. 596
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reasoning that New Jersey’s anti-usury laws applied to loans made to New Jersey consumers notwithstanding the location of the lender
- applying New Jersey law despite Illinois choice-of-law provision where plaintiff’s claims arose under New Jersey’s Retail Installment Sales Act
- applying the Retail Installment Sales Act to charge accounts offered by out-of-state defendants, but limiting the retrospective effect of its ruling because of defendants' \not wholly unreasonable reliance on a contrary doctrine\
- state consumers have protection of Retail Installment Sales Act no matter from where seller deals
- \the evil sought to be remedied by [RISA] is the charging of excessive interest to New Jersey consumers\
- \We have no doubt that the evil sought to be remedied by N.J.S.A. 17:16C-1 [to -61] is the charging of excessive interest to New Jersey consumers\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Judges Fritz, Polow and Joelson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.