Skip to main content
· 7/10/1981

Turner v. Aldens, Inc.

Citations

  • 433 A.2d 439
  • 179 N.J. Super. 596

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reasoning that New Jersey’s anti-usury laws applied to loans made to New Jersey consumers notwithstanding the location of the lender
  • applying New Jersey law despite Illinois choice-of-law provision where plaintiff’s claims arose under New Jersey’s Retail Installment Sales Act
  • applying the Retail Installment Sales Act to charge accounts offered by out-of-state defendants, but limiting the retrospective effect of its ruling because of defendants' \not wholly unreasonable reliance on a contrary doctrine\
  • state consumers have protection of Retail Installment Sales Act no matter from where seller deals
  • \the evil sought to be remedied by [RISA] is the charging of excessive interest to New Jersey consumers\
  • \We have no doubt that the evil sought to be remedied by N.J.S.A. 17:16C-1 [to -61] is the charging of excessive interest to New Jersey consumers\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judges Fritz, Polow and Joelson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.