Skip to main content
· 10/10/2003

Turner v. Alaska Communications Systems Long Distance, Inc.

Citations

  • 78 P.3d 264
  • 2003 Alas. LEXIS 104
  • 2003 WL 22320895

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that absent class members could not be held liable for attorney's fees upon an adverse judgment
  • observing that “the aggregation of small individual claims is an important use of the class action device, since without it, ‘aggrieved persons may be without any effective redress’ ” (quoting Deposit Guar. Nat’l Bank v. Roper, 445 U.S. 326, 339 (1980))
  • observing that “the aggregation of small individual claims is an important use of the class action device, since without it, ‘aggrieved persons may be without any effective redress’ ” (quoting Deposit Guar. Nat’l Bank v. Roper, 445 U.S. 326, 339 (1980))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fabe, Matthews, Eastaugh, Bryner, Carpeneti

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.