Turner, Patricia v. Channel Control Merchants, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying rule 54[b] certification for partial summary judgment that eliminated theory of relief, but did not finally adjudicate a separate claim
• vacating entry of partial judgment that was inconsistent with “bedrock policy against premature and piecemeal appeals”
• \because important policy interests are implicated . . . we raise and resolve the issue [of rule 54 (b) certification] sua sponte\
• \because important policy interests are implicated . . . we raise and resolve the issue [of rule 54 (b) certification] sua sponte\
• “[C]laims may be distinct even if they have some factual overlap . . .” (citation omitted)
• “likelihood of injustice or hardship to the parties” balanced against “traditional abhorrence of piecemeal appellate review”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).