Turner Investors v. Pirkl

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing the “logical predicate to such deference is that the circuit court make and the appellate court be able to discern an informed and reasoned decision”
• finding the legal analysis in Smith no longer valid due to changes to the relevant statute and rules and rejecting the notion that circuit courts “must make findings of fact whether they impose or deny a motion for sanctions” (emphasis in original)
• finding the legal analysis in Smith no longer valid due to changes to the relevant statute and rules and rejecting the notion that circuit courts “must make findings of fact whether they impose or deny -6- a motion for sanctions” (emphasis in original)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).