Turner Const. Co., Inc. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “once jurisdiction attaches [under 28 U.S.C. § 1491(b)], the Court of Federal Claims has broad equitable powers to fashion an appropriate remedy”
• holding that “once jurisdiction attaches [under 28 U.S.C. § 1491(b)], the Court of Federal Claims has broad equitable powers to fashion an appropriate remedy”
• explaining that reviewing courts conduct a “rational basis” review of the agency action at issue, rather than an “independent de novo assessment”
• explaining that reviewing courts conduct a “rational basis” review of the agency action at issue, rather than an “independent de novo assessment”
• explaining that reviewing courts conduct a “rational basis” review of the agency action at issue, rather than an “independent de novo assessment”
• observing that one issue was whether the relationship between the conflicted parties created “a competitive advantage over the other bidders”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).