Turnbull v. Boggs

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Having a writing that satisfies § 2-201 does not prove a contract exists nor does it prove the terms of. a contract.”
• \Having a writing that satisfies § 2-201 does not prove a contract exists nor does it prove the terms of a contract.\
• memorandum and letters discussing delivery read together satisfied the statute of frauds

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).