Turnage v. Ford Motor Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding plaintiff’s RCW 19.16.110 claim valid but the RCW 19.16.260 claim invalid because no evidence defendant violated RCW 19.16.260 simply by violating RCW 19.16.110
• finding plaintiff's RCW 19. 16.110 claim valid but the RCW 19.16.260 invalid because no evidence defendant violated RCW 19.16.260 simply by violating RCW 19. 16.11 0
• “[C]ourts have found an individual personally liable if ‘the individual 1
• “[C]ourts have found an individual 1 personally liable [as a debt collector under the FDCPA] if “the individual . . . exercised 2 control over the affairs of the business . . . or . . . was regularly engaged, directly and 3 indirectly, in the collection of debts.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).