Turn Key Gaming, Inc., Miller & Schroeder Investments Corp. v. Oglala Sioux Tribe

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a decision on the merits is inappropriate for a Rule 24(a) motion
• noting that “[a]n application for intervention cannot be resolved by reference to the ultimate merits of the claim the intervenor seeks to assert unless the allegations are frivolous on their face” (citation omitted)
• “Rule 24 is to be construed liberally, and doubts resolved in favor of the proposed intervenor.”
• “Rule 24 is to be construed liberally, and doubts resolved in favor of the proposed intervenor.”
• “An application for intervention cannot be resolved by reference to the ultimate merits of the claim the intervenor seeks to assert unless the allegations are frivolous on their face.”
• “application for intervention cannot be resolved by reference to the ultimate merits of the claim the intervenor seeks to assert unless the allegations are frivolous on their face”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).