Turley v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the use of an agent was permissible under a statute because the statute did not state or imply that the use of an agent was prohibited
• holding that a statute exempting a landowner from an excavation permit requirement must be interpreted to permit the landowner to use an employee or agent to accomplish the task
• “It is an elementary principle of law that a person may do anything through an agent that he may lawfully do personally, unless public policy or some agreement requires personal performance.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• San Juan Agricultural Water Users Ass'n v. KNME-TV
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 2011-03-08· cited 64×
• United States Brewers Ass'n v. Director of the New Mexico Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1983-07-21· cited 30×
• Keefe v. Department of Licensing
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1987-01-26· cited 15×
• Claridge v. New Mexico State Racing Commission
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1988-06-22· cited 13×
• Loverin v. Debusk
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1992-02-26· cited 8×
• San Juan Agricultural Water Users Ass'n v. KNME-TV
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2009-10-29· cited 6×
• State v. Cherryhomes
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1996-11-26· cited 6×
• Opinion No. (1996)
  Oklahoma Attorney General Reports· 1996-01-31

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Smith v. Walcott
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1973-07-20· cited 30×
• Coldwater Cattle Co. v. Portales Valley Project, Inc.
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1967-04-24· cited 10×
• Brown v. Bowling
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1952-02-06· cited 5×