Turk v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• in prosecution for robbery, exclusion by trial court of testimony of defendant’s expert witness regarding effect of defendant’s alcohol and drug use on his ability to formulate specific intent necessary for conviction was reversible error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Warren
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1989-06-14· cited 100×
• State v. Stradley
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1995-06-21· cited 35×
• Russell v. Municipality of Anchorage
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1985-09-20· cited 22×
• State v. Lowe
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1993-09-17· cited 16×
• State v. Jones
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1988-03-25· cited 9×
• Smaker v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1985-02-15· cited 7×
• Harvey v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2012-09-14· cited 7×
• State v. Caswell
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1992-02-19· cited 6×

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• State v. Lewis
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1981-08-20· cited 21×