Turk v. Angel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• claims for tortious interference properly dismissed where “plaintiffs would not be able to demonstrate that defendants’ conduct was the proximate cause of their alleged loss”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• InKine Pharmaceutical Co. v. Coleman
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2003-05-06· cited 33×
• State Street Bank and Trust Co. v. INVERSIONES ERRAZURIZ LIMIT.
  S.D. New York· 2002-11-05· cited 13×
• Murray Hill Investments, Inc. v. Parker Chapin Flattau & Klimpl, LLP
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2003-05-15· cited 8×
• Stafford v. Reiner
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2005-11-07· cited 4×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Estate of Nevelson v. Carro, Spanbock, Raster & Cuiffo
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2002-01-31· cited 23×
• Phillips-Smith Specialty Retail Group II, L.P. v. Parker Chapin Flattau & Klimpl, L. L. P.
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1999-10-19· cited 20×
• J.C. Klein, Inc. v. Forzley
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2001-12-13· cited 4×