Turill v. Phips

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ‘‘the defendant had no standing to object to the use of the evidence taken from his brother’s room since the defendant had no possessory interest in either the room searched or the evidence seized and was not present when his brother’s room was searched and the seizure [was] made’’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).