Turbyfill v. International Harvester Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that constitutional grant of rule making power to Michigan Supreme Court included power to adopt rules inconsistent with legislative statutes
• a written statement would have been admissible under Rule 803(5), had the declarant “been alive and present to testify at the trial” to the necessary foundation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).