· 10/15/2013
Tunoa v. Thomas
Citations
- 134 S. Ct. 430
- 187 L. Ed. 2d 290
- 82 U.S.L.W. 3215
- 571 U.S. 958
- 2013 WL 4014043
- 2013 U.S. LEXIS 7423
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that respondent could not resist a subpoena on Fifth Amendment grounds because the requested records met the three prongs of the required records exception
- concluding that the first “premise” of the Required Records Exception, as it pertained to BSA records, was satisfied
- concluding that respondent could not resist a subpoena on Fifth Amendment grounds because the requested records met the three prongs of the Required Records Exception
- concluding that the first “premise” of the Required Records Exception, as it pertained to BSA records, was satisfied
- concluding that the second prong of the Required Records Exception was met
- concluding that the second prong of the Required Records Exception was met
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.