Skip to main content
· 2/6/1991

Tunnell v. Hicks

Citations

  • 574 So. 2d 264
  • 1991 WL 15003

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that an unauthenticated letter attached as an exhibit to a motion was not admissible and not properly before the court
  • noting that an unauthenticated letter attached as an exhibit to a motion was not admissible and not properly before the court
  • noting that an unauthenticated letter attached as an exhibit to a motion was not admissible and not properly before the court
  • noting that an unauthenticated letter attached as an exhibit to a motion was not admissible and not properly before the court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ervin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.