Tunink v. Continental Fire Sprinkler Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• adopting the single publication rule as Virginia law holding that only one action for damages may be maintained for a single publication
• “Finally, and the consideration applies to the defamation and injurious falsehood claims as well as to invasion of privacy, the statute of limitations in the present action in the Virginia district court is for every count one year.”
• “Argument of counsel is not evidence[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).