Skip to main content
· 8/1/1988

Tumlinson v. State

Citations

  • 757 S.W.2d 440
  • 1988 Tex. App. LEXIS 2469
  • 1988 WL 104898

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • the rule change as to the psychotherapist-patient privilege did not deprive the accused of a substantial right which he enjoyed at the time of the offense, and posed no ex post facto problems; amendment simply enlarged the class of witnesses eligible to testify at trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Howell, Rowe, Baker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.