Skip to main content
· 9/5/1978

Tumbarella v. the Kroger Co.

Citations

  • 271 N.W.2d 284
  • 85 Mich. App. 482
  • 1978 Mich. App. LEXIS 2425

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • security officers had qualified privilege to report suspicions of employee’s theft of merchandise to management personnel responsible for hiring and firing
  • the mother’s allegation that the father had sexually abused their minor daughter was defamation per se because the allegation effectively accused the father of committing a crime
  • the mother's allegation that the father had sexually abused their minor daughter was defamation per se because the allegation effectively accused the father of committing a crime
  • “In cases involving questions of intent, credibility or state of mind, summary judgement is hardly ever appropriate.”
  • “[A]n employer has the qualified privilege to defame an employee by publishing statements to other employees whose duties interest them in the same subject matter.”
  • “In cases involving questions of intent, credibility or state of mind, summary judgement is hardly ever appropriate.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Maher, Gillis, McGregor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.