Tumax-Tuy v. Sessions

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that revealing one fact about a subject does not trigger a duty to reveal all facts on the subject, so long as \what was revealed would not be so incomplete as to mislead.\
• holding alleged misstatements stated claim, where stock dropped 13% after fraud charges were filed
• finding a corporation only must reveal the facts “that are needed so that what was revealed would not be so incomplete as to mislead.”
• “[R]evealing one fact about a subject does not trigger a duty to reveal all facts on the subject, so long as what was revealed would not be so incomplete as to mislead.”
• “[R]evealing one fact about a subject does not trigger a duty to reveal all facts on the subject, so long as what was revealed would not be so incomplete as to mislead.”
• “[R]evealing one fact about a subject does not trigger a duty to reveal all facts on the subject, so long as what was revealed would not be so incomplete as to mislead.” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).