Skip to main content
· 3/17/2010

Tully v. Rush County Prosecutor Barada

Citations

  • 599 F.3d 591
  • 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 5494
  • 2010 WL 938085

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \An obvious error in the language of a statute is self-correcting. State Farm Automobile Insurance Co. v. Reaves
  • finding no cognizable malicious prosecution claim where plaintiff “alleged no facts to imply malice”
  • finding no federal right not to be prosecuted without probable cause
  • “[H]e received procedural due process under the Fourteenth Amendment when the state court system vindicated him.”
  • \[t]here is no reason to believe that a computerized business record is not trustworthy unless the opposing party comes forward with some evidence to question its reliability. Hahnemann[

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bauer, Wood, Kennelly

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.